Authors: Purvi Asher, Partner and Karishma Maheshwari, Associate

This case concerns a recent decision dated 4 August 2025 by the Bombay High Court in the case of Sachin Malpani and Ors. vs. Nilam Patil and Ors. The writ petition questioned the method of levying maintenance charges in a registered condominium under the Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act, 1970 (“the Act”), and challenged the jurisdiction of the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies in directing such charges to be apportioned based on undivided share.

Brief Facts
The petition stemmed from a dispute in the ‘Treasure Park’ condominium comprising 356 apartments. The petitioners, owning larger apartments (3BHK, 4BHK), objected to an order by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Pune, dated 8 July 2021, which directed that maintenance charges be levied proportionate to the undivided share of each owner, instead of the previously prevailing equal charge. The challenge was rejected by the Co-operative Court on 13 May 2022, prompting the present writ petition.

Issues for Adjudication
The core issues for adjudication were:

 

1. Whether the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies had jurisdiction under the Act to pass such orders.
2. What is the correct method of levying maintenance charges- equal across apartments or proportionate to undivided share in common areas, as prescribed by law and the condominium’s Deed of Declaration.

Held
The Bombay High Court held that:

• Notifications issued by the State Government validly conferred powers of the Registrar under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 onto the District Deputy Registrar, thus justifying the order's jurisdiction.
• The Deed of Declaration provisions and Sections 6 and 10 of the Act require that both common profits and common expenses be distributed among apartment owners in proportion to their undivided interest.
• The impugned resolutions and past practice of equal maintenance do not override statutory requirements; apartment owners with a higher undivided share must contribute proportionally to common expenses.

Relief
The Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding both the Deputy Registrar’s order dated 8 July 2021, and the Co-operative Court’s order dated 13 May 2022. The petitioners’ challenge was rejected, confirming the requirement of proportionate maintenance charges.

MHCO Comment
This judgment clarifies the application of the Act in the context of maintenance contribution in registered condominiums, emphasizing statutory compliance over majority resolutions. It confirms that statutory covenants in the Deed of Declaration and the Act must govern apportionment of expenses, ensuring fairness in financial obligations shared among owners according to their interest, preventing disproportionate burdens on smaller flat owners and aligning practice with the law.

This update was released on 08 Aug 2025.

The views expressed in this update are personal and should not be construed as any legal advice. Please contact us directly on +91 22 40565252 or legalupdates@mhcolaw.com for any assistance.

Legal Update Team
MANSUKHLAL HIRALAL & COMPANY
Advocates, Solicitors and Notaries
T: +91 22 40565252
Mumbai Office: Surya Mahal, 2nd Floor, 5, Burjorji Bharucha Marg, Fort, Mumbai-400 023, India
Delhi Office: Block C-9, Lower Ground Floor, Jangpura Extension, New Delhi - 110 014, India
www.mhcolaw.com

"Noted lawyer in the Real Estate practitioner from India" - Chambers & Partners

Please consider the environment before printing this email

The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. This communication may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken relying on the contents is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, or if you or your employer does not consent to email messages of this kind, please notify the sender immediately by responding to this email and then delete it from your system. No liability is accepted for any harm that may be caused to your systems or data by this message.